This is an open letter to our President, Vice President, Attorney General, the FBI, The Inspectors General, The Justice Department, The Department of Homeland Secutiry, our State Senators, the current candidates for President, the news media and the general population.

Can anyone explain to the American public how someone who is running for THE highest office in the land, one of the most influential and supposedly respected political offices in the world, is allowed to run for that office while she is being investigated for violations of US security measures at best and possibly treasonous acts at worst?!?!?!  I understand the concept of innocence until proven guilty, however, clearly she has lied (over and over again).   What would the consequences be if 1) she’s indicted prior to being nominated for President or 2) if she’s still under investigation and indicted AFTER she (god forbid) won the election? Isn’t there some type of law, regulation, or statute that prevents someone currently under investigation from running for office? It’s beyond my comprehension (and I’m a fairly intelligent person), that this is happening.

  • WHO is making sure that the laws that govern the receipt/ dissemination/ transmission/ storage of classified information are being followed to the letter of the law??
  • WHO is covering this up/delaying the process?
  • WHO is being protected (maybe Obama or former AG Eric Holder because they knew about this and didn’t act on it? Of COURSE THEY KNEW. Her email address was Clintonmail.com not .GOV !! Did the President or the AG NEVER send an email to their Secretary of State? Hogwash !!!)
  • WHY is the FBI and Justice Department dragging it’s feet on this matter?
  • WHY has she not been prosecuted yet, when just last week the State Department released approximately 3,000 additional pages of emails from Hillary Clinton’s private email account, including 66 that were deemed as classified, increasing the number of such emails to 1,340 and also included a thread in which then Secretary of State instructed an adviser to transmit secure information using non-secure email.
  • WHO is protecting Hillary till after the election (Obama, the FBI, or us Attorney General Loretta Lynch?).

Here’s proof it’s a distinct possibility:

The FBI knew from the summer of 2012, (including FBI Director Robert Mueller and US Attorney General Eric Holder) about General Petreus’s affair and possible disclosure of classified information of them to his mistress BUT decided to withhold information until after the presidential election on November 6. It was two months before Mueller and Holder finally allowed FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce to notify the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper late on November 6 about the discovery of the affair. Agents had confronted Broadwell on November 2, 2012. The report did not reach headquarters until November 5. Mueller and Holder reviewed it on November 6 (election day), and decided that it was time to inform (Director of National Intelligence) Clapper.

As for Hillary, in 2009, she started using the private server, shortly after her swearing in as Secretary of State. As part of her appointment to the SOS position she was supposed to sign a “Sensitive Compartmented Non-Disclosure Agreement”. (see Executive Order 12958 Section 4.2( (a)(2) below)

Here’s the rub: She was mandated to sign this but there’s controversy about whether she actually signed it or not. Question: If she was supposed to sign it and did, then clearly she was in violation of that agreement; If she was supposed to sign it and DIDN’T sign it, WHO and WHY allowed this to happen?? Another example of how the Clinton’s are above the law?

This agreement says “I (meaning Hillary) have been advised that the unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI by me could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.”

Further it states, that “I have been advised that my breach of this agreement…that any unauthorized disclosure of SCI by me may constitute violations of United States criminal laws…” [see Title 18, Section 793(f)(1)]

It further references several US Codes: Title 18, Sections 793,794,798,952 and Title 50, Section 783(b) and Executive Order 12958

SOME SECTIONS APPLY TO HER POSITION, SOME DO NOT. HOWEVER THE WORDS NEGLIGENCE, NEGLIGENT OR NEGLIGENTLY APPEAR SEVERAL TIMES AS CONSTITUTING A VIOLATION OF THE CODE. IF NOTHING ELSE, HILLARY WAS NEGLIGENT (willfully or arrogantly???) IN HER ACTIONS BY CIRCUMVENTING THE PROPER PROTOCOL OF HANDLING SENSITIVE INFORMATION VIA EMAIL.)

Let’s look at the US Codes cited:

Title 18 Section 793(d) says:

Whomever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or having access to any document, writing…or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation willfully communicates, delivers, or causes to be communicated, delivered or transmitted….

Section 793(f)(1): who through gross negligence …permits the same to be…delivered to anyone in violation of his (her) trust (THE AGREEMENT AND THIS CODE)….SHALL be fine or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

Section 798(a) says: Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information – (3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government;

“ANY MANNER PREJUDICIAL TO THE SAFETY OR INTEREST OF THE UNITES STATES.” I’D SAY HAVING AN INSECURE SERVER TO SEND AND RECEIVE CLASSIFIED OR POTENTIALLY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION IS PREJUDICIAL TO THE SAFETY OR INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES.

Executive order 12958 says:

Information may not be considered for classification unless it concerns:

(a) military plans, weapons systems, or operations;

(b) foreign government information;

(c) intelligence activities (including special activities), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology;

(d) foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources;

(e) scientific, technological, or economic matters relating to the national security;

(f) United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials or facilities; or

(g) vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations, projects or plans relating to the national security.

CLEARLY, AS SOS, HILLARY HAD ACCESS TO ALL OF THE ABOVE CLASSIFICATIONS OF INFORMATION.

Part 4 of E. O. 12598 says:

Sec. 4.1. Definitions. For purposes of this order: (a) “Safeguarding” means measures and controls that are prescribed to protect classified information.

(b) “Access” means the ability or opportunity to gain knowledge of classified information.

(c) “Need-to-know” means a determination made by an authorized holder of classified information that a prospective recipient requires access to specific classified information in order to perform or assist in a lawful and authorized governmental function.

(d) “Automated information system” means an assembly of computer hardware, software, or firmware configured to collect, create, communicate, compute, disseminate, process, store, or control data or information.

(e) “Integrity” means the state that exists when information is unchanged from its source and has not been accidentally or intentionally modified, altered, or destroyed.

(f) “Network” means a system of two or more computers that can exchange data or information.

(g) “Telecommunications” means the preparation, transmission, or communication of information by electronic means.

(h) “Special access program” means a program established for a specific class of classified information that imposes safeguarding and access requirements that exceed those normally required for information at the same classification level.

Sec. 4.2. General Restrictions on Access. (a) A person may have access to classified information provided that:

(1) a favorable determination of eligibility for access has been made by an agency head or the agency head’s designee;

(2) the person has signed an approved nondisclosure agreement; and

(3) the person has a need-to-know the information.

(c) Classified information may not be removed from official premises without proper authorization.

(d) Persons authorized to disseminate classified information outside the executive branch shall assure the protection of the information in a manner equivalent to that provided within the executive branch.

(e) Consistent with law, directives, and regulation, an agency head or senior agency official shall establish uniform procedures to ensure that automated information systems, including networks and telecommunications systems, that collect, create, communicate, compute, disseminate, process, or store classified information have controls that:

(1) prevent access by unauthorized persons; and

(2) ensure the integrity of the information.

AGAIN, AN UNSECURED PRIVATE SERVER DOES NOT KEEP TO THE DIRECTIVE ABOVE

(f) Consistent with law, directives, and regulation, each agency head or senior agency official shall establish controls to ensure that classified information is used, processed, stored, reproduced, transmitted, and destroyed under conditions that provide adequate protection and prevent access by unauthorized persons.

Part 5 E.O. 12983 says:

Sec. 5.1. Definitions. For purposes of this order: (a) “Self-inspection” means the internal review and evaluation of individual agency activities and the agency as a whole with respect to the implementation of the program established under this order and its implementing directives.

(b) “Violation” means:

(1) any knowing, willful, or negligent action that could reasonably be expected to result in an unauthorized disclosure of classified information;

KEEP IN MIND THAT ONE OF THE RECENTLY RELEASED EMAILS PLAINLY SAYS THAT HILLARY INSTRUCTED CLASSIFIED INFORMATION TO BE TRANSMITTED VIA UNSECURE EMAIL

Sec. 5.7. Sanctions. (a) If the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office finds that a violation of this order or its implementing directives may have occurred, the Director shall make a report to the head of the agency or to the senior agency official so that corrective steps, if appropriate, may be taken.

(b) Officers and employees of the United States Government, and its contractors, licensees, certificate holders, and grantees shall be subject to appropriate sanctions if they knowingly, willfully, or negligently:

(1) disclose to unauthorized persons information properly classified under this order or predecessor orders;

(2) classify or continue the classification of information in violation of this order or any implementing directive;

(3) create or continue a special access program contrary to the requirements of this order; or

(4) contravene any other provision of this order or its implementing directives.

(c) Sanctions may include reprimand, suspension without pay, removal, termination of classification authority, loss or denial of access to classified information, or other sanctions in accordance with applicable law and agency regulation. [see Title 18, Section 793(f)(1)]

(d) The agency head, senior agency official, or other supervisory official shall, at a minimum, promptly remove the classification authority of any individual who demonstrates reckless disregard or a pattern of error in applying the classification standards of this order.

Interestingly enough the final paragraph says:

Sec. 6.2. Effective Date. This order shall become effective 180 days from the date of this order.

WILLIAM J. CLINTON

THE WHITE HOUSE, April 17, 1995.

Back to Hillary lying.

July 2015”

She said “First, let me say that I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received,”. That same month TWO inspectors general determine in a memo that Mrs. Clinton’s private account contained “hundreds of potentially classified emails.”

August 2015:

  1. Mrs. Clinton’s campaign acknowledged there was material on the server was later classified, but noted that “all the examples were of other people sending information to her.” A spokesman called her “a passive recipient of unwitting information that subsequently became deemed as classified”. Clinton then personally revised her statement about classified email a second time, stating that she never sent or received any that were marked classified.

OBVIOUSLY THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THAT CLINTON DID RECEIVE CLASSIFIED EMAILS ON HER UNSECURE SERVER / PRIVATE EMAIL ADDRESS.

I ASK YOU THIS, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE WHOM THE SENDER OR RECIPIENT OF THE EMAIL WAS? I’LL TELL YOU WHAT DIFFERENCE IT MAKES.

In 1995, The State Department updated the Foreign Affairs manual to state that “sensitive but unclassified” information should not be transmitted through personal e-mail accounts. “It is the Department’s general policy that normal day-to-day operations be conducted on an authorized AIS [Automated Information System], which has the proper level of security control to provide nonrepudiation, authentication and encryption, to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the resident information,” the manual says.

The manual says that it is up to officials themselves to determine which e-mails should be considered federal records:  “E-mail message creators and recipients must decide whether a particular message is appropriate for preservation.”

CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE MATERIALS. . HILLARY IS A SMART WOMAN. AS SECRETARY OF STATE, CAN SHE REALLY EXPECT US TO BELIEVE THAT EVEN THOUGH THE EMAILS MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN “MARKED” CLASSIFIED AT THE TIME, THAT ONCE SHE READ THEM SHE WAS TOO STUPID TO KNOW IT MIGHT BE SENSITIVE MATERIAL??

  1. State Dept. tells Judge Sullivan that Clinton did not use State Dept. issued or secure Blackberry device; Blackberries used by Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin were likely destroyed.

PLEASE NOTE THAT HUMA ABEDIN WAS HILLARY’S DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT, ADVISOR AND CLOSE FRIEND.

Huma Abedin is a former employee of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, which shares the Muslim Brotherhood’s goal of establishing Islamic supremacy and Sharia Law worldwide

Dr. Zyed Abedin, founder of the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) is the father of Huma Abedin. The IMMA, has a manifesto that reads in part:

  1. Recruit individual Muslims who live in non-Muslim lands and transform them as a collective unit by establishing Islamic centers, educational programs, mosques, and organizations (like the Islamic Society of North America and the Muslim Students Association) that serve to prevent Muslims from assimilating into the cultures of their non-Muslim host nations.
  2. 2) Encourage these Muslim residents of non-Muslim host nations to shift the demographic scales in their own favor by means of population growth—and separatism—thereby enabling them to more effectively advance an agenda based on fundamentalist Wahhabi teachings and the legitimation and spread of Sharia Law in the West.
  3. 3) Eventually the proliferation of Muslims in the host nations will hit critical mass, tilting those societies toward majority-Muslim status..

The State Department — during Ms. Abedin’s tenure —had ties to Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s chief sharia jurist. Huma Abedin’s mother, Saleha, who is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s female division (the “Muslim Sisterhood”), is a major figure in not one but two Union for Good components. The first is the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief (IICDR). [It is banned in Israel for supporting Hamas.] and the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC).  Dr. Abedin’s IICWC describes itself as part of the IICDR. Coincidently the IICWC charter was written by. . . Sheikh Qaradawi, along with several other members of the Muslim Brotherhood. Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/312211/huma-abedins-muslim-brotherhood-ties-andrew-c-mccarthy

September 2015:

  1. Mrs. Clinton says she’s “sorry”for her use of a private server in an interview with ABC News’ David Muir.

PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW SAYING SHES ‘SORRY’ WILL ELIMINATE THE FACT THAT SHE POTENTIALLY COMPROMISED THE USA AND HUNDREDS ON COVERT OPERATIVES/ OPERATIONS ACROSS THE WORLD, NOT TO MENTION BROKE THE LAW??

Most recently in January 2016 The Inspector General for the intelligence community Charles McCullough told members of Congress that several dozen additional classified emails have been identified including some with a higher classification than top secret, regarding highly sensitive programs.

Eighteen emails, including eight email chains between Clinton and President Obama, are being “withheld in full” to “protect the President’s ability to receive unvarnished advice and counsel. ” They are being described as “too damaging to release” {and probably contain incriminating information and correspondence between Hill-lie-ary and the POtuS]

Withheld in full”,  with not even partial redactions, surely challenges the claims by the State Department (and Hillary and her staffers) that none of the intelligence in the emails was classified when Clinton received them on her personal server. (EVEN IF NOT MARKED AS SUCH, A POINT HILLARY IS SO FOND OF MAKING TO GET HERSELF OFF THE HOOK. HOWEVER, AS I  POINTED OUT PREVIOUSLY, ACCORDING TO THE US CODE IT WAS HER RESPONSIBILITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE TO MAKE THAT DETERMINATION)

All this deceitful, untruthful, deceptive, misleading and outright dangerous activity is proof that Clinton is not even qualified to be dog catcher- yet, this woman is still being allowed to run for President of the United States???  She campaigns as if she doesn’t have a care in the world, shows no remorse for her deceptions, it’s almost sociopathic. WE THE PEOPLE need, no deserve, to have this travesty explained, investigated and prosecuted to stop her in her tracks NOW !!!

Advertisements